The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We later found out that he also had a prolactin-secreting adenoma in his brain, in his pituitary gland, so he probably had some derivative of a multiple endocrine neoplasia, another zebra thing that medical students like, but this gentleman's blood pressure was never going to get better, no matter what we did, unless we removed the tumor that was secreting excess aldosterone into his blood.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.