The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um, and so we think that there's no studies that have been that have shown this yet, but we think that, you know, if you're diving, same different kind of apnea um through pregnancy that would also increase your risk for these disorders. And so what we saw was that there was a genetic variant that was actually driving their um like a lowering of their diastolic blood pressure while they were diving.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I mean I think well you know that's one of the things that we're hoping to find from studying these women. So if they've evolved some kind of protective mechanism that protects them in the case of apnea, maybe that's something we could develop into a therapeutic that could be used to help prevent that same uh you know hypertensive disorder pregnancy in pregnant women who have apnea for other reasons.