Peter Attia· MD
and to be clear that means that a blood pressure of 130 over 85 which historically would have been considered normal is anything but normal now
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and to be clear that means that a blood pressure of 130 over 85 which historically would have been considered normal is anything but normal now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look at the Sprint trial I think it's very clear that 120 over 80 is the place to be and that's better than 130 over 85 which used to be the standard for hypertension