Peter Attia· MD
the hypothesis that getting as close to 120 over 80 rather than letting people sort of float up to 140 over 90 was better or not and it turned out that it was
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the hypothesis that getting as close to 120 over 80 rather than letting people sort of float up to 140 over 90 was better or not and it turned out that it was
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we actually have evidence that being closer to 120 over 80 impacts mortality and uh and that permitting people to run higher to a level that we used to consider to be just basically pre-hypertension or just normal even an older person 140 over 90 that leads to a significant increase in risk of dieting
we actually have evidence that being closer to 120 over 80 impacts mortality and uh and that permitting people to run higher to a level that we used to consider to be just basically pre-hypertension or just normal even an older person 140 over 90 that leads to a significant increase in risk of dieting