The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
very bad thing because it activates this receptor called tlr4 which the body uses to sense actually external pathogens so to the body this is the same as if you actually somebody injected you with like a strain of bacteria directly into the bloodstream
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
over time this irritates the intestinal wall and increases its permeability so over time you're going to start to see increased absorption into the bloodstream of endotoxin very bad thing because it activates this receptor called tlr4