The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i start doing my cleaning periodontal disease and after i treat it and they were going through radiation some of them i'd say well i'm gonna clean your mouth twice a week radiation is usually six to eight weeks so if i change clean your mouth every two weeks at least you're gonna get a baseline middle radiation and end and others will say well if he's not responding really well i always just start trying to say what can i do to to get a good oral health others i start every week
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
on my small pilot that i did to lead to this large trial that i'm doing now i saw that main inflammatory markers i i look at saliva inflammatory markers and microbiome before they started the trial in three months after they completed the last dose of radiation and then when i look at cytokines i sampled several cytokines in saliva most of them they are completely suppressed on the oral cavity they're all cancer patients but the group that i didn't do the periodontal disease they all had even increased on those but the ones that i did is very comprehensive they all gone suppressed on the negative so it's clearly showing that that's something going on systemically on those patients