Paul Saladino· MD
I think that a longer autoimmune disease the more likely the target tissue is going to be damaged and that can be tough so if a target tissue is damaged it may not actually recover function
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think that a longer autoimmune disease the more likely the target tissue is going to be damaged and that can be tough so if a target tissue is damaged it may not actually recover function
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but I think that autoimmune disease theoretically should be able to be reversed regardless of whether you've had it for a long amount of time or a short amount of time it just has to do with preservation of the tissue that the autoimmune disease is targeting