The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think there's a real misunderstanding in the communities in the nutrition community that about the prevalence of insulin induced insulin resistance i think it's extremely rare in humans and we don't need to be as strict about about absolute levels of insulin or insulin area under the curve
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
insulin induced insulin resistance isn't very common I think it's essentially vanishingly rare in humans