The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the second thing you have to do is you have to protect your endothelium so anything that aggravates and weakens and makes the endothelium more vulnerable to penetration by apob is problematic and the most common factors that we think are doing that are smoking blood pressure and very likely the metabolic conditions that cluster with insulin resistance hyperinsulinemia um and uh type to diabetes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the most common factors that we think are doing that are smoking blood pressure and very likely the metabolic conditions that cluster with insulin resistance hyperinsulinemia um and uh type two diabetes