Andrew Huberman· PhD
I think that that data is unclear on the basis of if you are um glycemic normal meaning that you currently do not have signs of type two two diabetes or you're not pre-diabetic then that may not necessarily be the case
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think that that data is unclear on the basis of if you are um glycemic normal meaning that you currently do not have signs of type two two diabetes or you're not pre-diabetic then that may not necessarily be the case
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.