Rhonda Patrick· PhD
What's also amazing is this idea of 'exercise snacks,' brief one-minute bursts of high-intensity exercise spread throughout your day, being studied for their impact on markers like insulin sensitivity.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What's also amazing is this idea of 'exercise snacks,' brief one-minute bursts of high-intensity exercise spread throughout your day, being studied for their impact on markers like insulin sensitivity.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And we're following them for three months, a 12-week intervention. And we're comparing it to a movement snacks control group. So a group that's getting a very similar intervention, but they're not engaging in vigorous intensity exercise. So it's more stretching, mobility exercise. And so the key variable that's changing there is the intensity of the movements. And we're seeing, you know, how do people adhere to that? Like, will people even do that? And if they do it, is it enough to move the needle in terms of things like cardiorespiratory fitness, blood markers of fat, immune function, glucose, and measures of insulin sensitivity as well?