The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I include insulin here because I think that insulin is in and of itself actually toxic at high levels to the endothelium and James O'Keefe just recently was on a paper that looked at cardiovascular health in patients with type 1 diabetes so that they were able to actually use the insulin doses that people were using as a way to actually assess the impact on the I can remember it was myocardium or endothelium
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Endothelial health is the hardest thing to see but I include insulin here because I think that insulin is in and of itself actually toxic at high levels to the endothelium and James O'Keefe just recently was on a paper that looked at cardiovascular health in patients with type 1 diabetes so that they were able to actually use the insulin doses that people were using as a way to actually assess the impact on the... I can't remember if it was myocardium or endothelium.