The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we can get improvements in physiology with a calorie restricted diet but what we're not gonna get is stable blood sugars and we know that these median amplitude who Coast excursions postprandial e meaning how high the blood sugar ramps up after you eat can affect the endothelium and many other vascular markers in the negative way and long-term nutrient adequacy is not going to be able to be achieved by Twinkie diets
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.