The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
during ketosis your body says hey the muscles don't need glucose because they can use ketones so they start refusing glucose now technically at the level of the muscle that is insulin resistance but you're not insulin resistant everywhere
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you do become physiologically insulin resistant when you are ketogenic so i'm i'm sure you experienced this in the rangers you know you're out you haven't eaten for a few days your body goes into ketosis and your body is then sparing glucose that it's making through gluconeogenesis for the testicles the red blood cells the adrenals and the brain and it doesn't it says no no muscles don't take up glucose because you can do fine with ketones right
your body is then sparing glucose that it's making through gluconeogenesis for the testicles the red blood cells the adrenals and the brain and it doesn't it says no no muscles don't take up glucose because you can do fine with ketones right
and that process is going to create physiologic insulin resistance at the level of the muscle so you're refusing glucose so basically if you're in ketosis if you don't have carbohydrates your body is going to spare glucose for the tissues that really need it the brain the testicles the adrenals