The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and her glucagon had actually gone from around a hundred down to I think 56 in that time and other markers had also improved but interestingly her insulin had stayed the same and she did give me permission to share that information wherever what was her insulin throughout the test you have a sense 20/20 throughout it huh which we would think of as a high yes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.