Andrew Huberman· PhD
large magnitude, for example, 52% less postprandial, that's after a meal, glucose excursion, So 52% less increase in blood glucose and 60%, six zero less hyper insulinemia, so reduced levels of insulin.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
large magnitude, for example, 52% less postprandial, that's after a meal, glucose excursion, So 52% less increase in blood glucose and 60%, six zero less hyper insulinemia, so reduced levels of insulin.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
More about the study includes the fact that the benefits they observed were very long lasting, as long as two hours after a meal, they could still see this improved blood glucose utilization.
It's not a replacement for exercise, but the shifts in glucose and insulin utilization and output respectively were very impressive.
What they saw was that there was a dramatic, highly statistically significant increase in blood glucose utilization and reduction in both insulin levels during that activity and around the clock.
the activation of this muscle the Solus which makes up about 1% of the body's total musculature — involved caused rather a disproportionate use of blood glucose so it mobilized blood glucose in a good way