The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if people are going to ingest artificial sweeteners, and they do that along with foods that very sharply increase blood glucose, then there is the potential, I highlight the potential, for those same artificial sweeteners to increase insulin, even in the absence of food.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the idea was well maybe you can um create a conditioned pavlovian like response to artificial sweeteners