The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
That's two problems, right? First of all, you don't have your energy to burn in the mitochondria to make energy. The other problem is that that sugar, that glucose that circulates in your bloodstream and doesn't get taken up into your muscle and your brain starts to damage the lining of the blood vessels, and we know that is type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.