The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I'm going to be presumably I believe this is a reasonable statement to make as metabolically healthy in 20 years of eating the exact same diet that I have now for the last four to 5 years with some adjustments in those years obviously the addition of fruit but my fasting insulin remains low less than three micro IU per ml I'm going to be equally insulin sensitive in 20 years
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I take whole package and B4 against mostly on a daily basis and I'm getting fruit lots of fruit honey raw milk this is an animal-based diet I'm eating lots of saturated fat and My fasting insulin with carbohydrates often greater than 200 grams per day are less than three micro IU per ml
so if red meat if saturated fat is causing diabetes why am I not insulin resistant it's just an anecdote but it's an interesting experimental vessel if fruit and carbohydrates are causing insulin resistance regardless of the source then why am I not insulin resistant