Peter Attia· MD
you want to try to catch people in this window of either either early insulin resistance um or not yet developed insulin resistance
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
you want to try to catch people in this window of either either early insulin resistance um or not yet developed insulin resistance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But in its earliest stages the glucose is still normal but there's this cold war happening in the body where the insulin levels are still two or three or four times higher than they used to be.
People much of modern clinical care has what I call a glucosecentric paradigm when it comes to monitoring metabolic health or even cardioabolic health given how relevant diabetes and metabolic problems are to cardiovascular disease. But the the consequence of the glucosecentric paradigm and there's reasons for it. So I don't mean to s to state this in any kind of incriminating way. They they have their own justification for the glucosecentric paradigm, but it's increasingly harder to overlook because of what we know with regards to insulin.
So insulin resistance in its earliest stages is high insulin but normal glucose.