The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
LDL is involved in atherosclerosis but only uh as sort of a an innocent bystander is perhaps the least technical way that I could say this and that you have to correct for oxidation of the LDL and underlying insulin resistance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if your fasting insulin is low I don't think that LDL is in any way shape or form causitive atherosclerosis I think it is the fireman that shows up to put out the fire not the arsonist