Paul Saladino· MD
if you're absorbing 30% less sugar then obviously your blood sugar is going to be improved from that from that standpoint
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you're absorbing 30% less sugar then obviously your blood sugar is going to be improved from that from that standpoint
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as far as fruit is concerned I was talking to to Dr Gary fety about this actually and he was saying that there's actually a lot of things in Fruit you know vitamin C and other sorts of you know vitamins and minerals which actually mitigate the effects of fructose in the body