The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these do not mean that carbohydrates cause the metabolic dysfunction and i would argue very strongly that there are many examples of indigenous cultures which i will show data for in a moment sumo wrestlers not an indigenous culture but you get the idea tucacinta tava ruins catavins who eat lots of carbohydrates in their diet and do not develop insulin resistance or metabolic dysfunction these are synonyms so anyone who asserts that carbohydrates cause diabetes is wrong
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you are a metabolically healthy individual you can include some carbohydrates in your diet if you choose to and not get diabetes presuming that you the really important thing to do is to avoid the polyunsaturated fats at an evolutionarily inconsistent level