The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the reverse I think is what we are both advocating for which is a higher fat lower carbohydrate diet and I would say I would want people to have a robust amount of protein on that diet and that is going to deplete liver glycogen get otology preserve lean muscle mass and not have the issues with storing but it's the combination of carbohydrates and fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.