Peter Attia· MD
I, you know, think you're at underestimate it. Yeah, I always always underestimate it. Uh, probably because just fat is so calorically dense, right?
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I, you know, think you're at underestimate it. Yeah, I always always underestimate it. Uh, probably because just fat is so calorically dense, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But we know that's like I just knew that was BS to begin with because there are some people who can easily overeat on a ketogenic diet.
When you're choosing to do a ketogenic diet, including monitoring people really need to track nutrients, track calories. Some people put, you know, they eat a ketogenic diet, but they put the same amount of food on the plate. And the caloric density of the ketogenic diet is like 50% higher. So you can't eat. So typically, you know, we have auto feedback mechanisms that will tell us when we're satiated full, but for some people they don't work well. So they do need to count calories and macronutrients and track at least initially. So they have some idea of how many calories we're eating.