The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but here's Dave's cohort which I think you remember how many people were in the study it's probably like I don't have the exact num I think they had 70 or 80 people um and they didn't there there's no correlation between it 80 it was 80 people there's no correlation between cardiovascular disease so this is where we are and this is where Mike and I start asking these questions
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look at the high end of a melan randomization which is a type of study that looks at genetic polymorphisms that lead to in this case higher levels of LDL and genetic polymorphisms that lead to lower levels of LDL is there a relationship between LDL level and cardiovascular disease and indeed there is