The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for females as I mentioned it actually isn't good but we suspect it's because the the drug dose the drug concentrations in the blood of females may be toxic so we really want to do that again but with lower concentrations of the drug
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as I mentioned it actually isn't good but we suspect it's because the the drug dose the drug concentrations in the blood of females may be toxic so we really want to do that again but with lower concentrations of the drug