The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
PCR can fingerprint the person and this is sort of like saying there are three people you know and I just need to see which fingerprint it is to know if it's the lab strain which would be a contamination if it showed up in your sample a naturally occurring strain so it's a transmission that you acquired versus a vaccine strain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.