Paul Saladino· MD
Observational research is pretty misleading. Don't bet the farm on healthy user bias.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Observational research is pretty misleading. Don't bet the farm on healthy user bias.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you are trying to stack epidemiology observational epidemiology on top of observational epidemiology that doesn't change the quality of the study or as you say the credibility of the study the credence that we give to observational epidemiology is massively shaky at best because of two things ah healthy user bias and unhealthy user bias
the credence that we give to observational epidemiology is massively shaky at best because of two things ah healthy user bias and unhealthy user bias