The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And then we started realizing the things that they saw mattered. At first, we thought, 'Well, let's find what they like. What do they like the most?' You may remember these old experiments where they found that if you give a baby a face, and then you give it a cartoon face, it'll look more strongly at the cartoon face, the exaggerated black and white face.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.