The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Well, if you are very, very concerned about the outcome, like you've put a lot of money on the table in a given game, or you're a football player in the Super Bowl, or you're playing a game for which, you know, defeating the other person or your team winning is absolutely crucial to you. Well then that's not really going to who engage the play circuitry.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.