Andrew Huberman· PhD
and to my astonishment when I was done the slope of the decline was exactly the same to the first decimal place it had not explained anything and I was like oh my God this looks like it might be real
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and to my astonishment when I was done the slope of the decline was exactly the same to the first decimal place it had not explained anything and I was like oh my God this looks like it might be real
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so what I did was to get the 61 studies go through them and try to extract information on all the factors that could explain the decline so I created a multivariable model and ran that model and to my astonishment when I was done the slope of the decline was exactly the same to the first decimal place it had not explained anything