The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
first of all we show cross sectioning that LPA drops until the age of eighty by half in other words it feels hot like that you like crazy people until it's not right and then and then you look at it and you kind of try to understand just a minute now this thing that killed now all of a sudden centenarians have even more right it should stay flat actually right it should be flat why is it increasing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
LP little a would be a longevity gene in inverse so the lower your LP little a the greater your chance of cardiovascular mortality
So you can get some of them, but certainly ApoE would be one of the longevity genes. LP little a would be a longevity gene in inverse. So the lower your LP little a, the greater your chance of cardiovascular mortality.