The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
concussion fights dirty like whatever you bring to the table that's weak seems to be affected more more more generally in patients in other words there's pre-existing risk factors to have a worse outcome from this injury that will probably be quite surprising to hear for people
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's pre-existing risk factors to have a worse outcome from this injury that will probably be quite surprising to hear for people and not only those risk factors not only put you at more risk for Less Force causing concussion but they tell you what kind of concussion you're likely to have if you do have a concussion
Peter and this is important concussion fights dirty like whatever you bring to the table that's weak seems to be affected more more more generally in patients in other words there's pre-existing risk factors to have a worse outcome from this injury that will probably be quite surprising to hear for people um and not only those risk factors not only put you at more risk for Less Force causing concussion but they tell you what kind of concussion you're likely to have if you do have a concussion