The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But if it's not sustained, how quickly is it going to return? And I think we don't know that. My guess would be about as transient as kind of the effect...you know, if you could dilute and that's maintained for a while, it would probably be maintained in terms of the cells' kind of features and epigenetic measures. But yeah, if it returned really quickly, then I think it would be more transient.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.