Andrew Huberman· PhD
whereas because CBD doesn't produce an intoxicating state it's not really perceptible from the person who's taken it um that it's doing anything that actually does make it far more amenable to do blinded trials with
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
whereas because CBD doesn't produce an intoxicating state it's not really perceptible from the person who's taken it um that it's doing anything that actually does make it far more amenable to do blinded trials with
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.