We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
there is really not good evidence in humans this is very much akin to what we see with tmao we're either using animal studies we're looking at observational studies and when we actually look at human studies it doesn't appear to be harmful
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now that's not really a problem unless you can show mechanistic issues or we can show problems in humans this has not actually been shown to be a problem in humans most of the concern over new 5gc is based on you guessed it animal studies