Andrew Huberman· PhD
So it's a it's an active process for us as humans or as animals if we want to talk about the animal research too and where we've learned most all of this from that that our body has to work hard to get that into our system.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So it's a it's an active process for us as humans or as animals if we want to talk about the animal research too and where we've learned most all of this from that that our body has to work hard to get that into our system.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Now you take that leaf material and then you do something like you mentioned, put it into a tonic or you put it into a concentrate form uh or an extract. And now the compounds have been already pulled out of the leaf material by the the the solvent or the liquid that's being utilized, whether it's ethanol or it's uh oil or some other some other type of uh vehicle.