The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know a good example is try doing a random try getting it past the IRB uh a randomized controlled trial and you're gonna see you know get people a carton of Marlboros they're going to smoke that over you know each day compared to placebo group it's unethical and so with this it's I don't know how many times they saw these Adverse Events with each ctep inhibitor and it's I guess the same drug class they might have different mechanisms but does there does there become a
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.