Paul Saladino· MD
another researcher came out epidemiological data saying only three or four migal magnetic field exposure which is nothing is increased statistical significant risk of childhood leukemia
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
another researcher came out epidemiological data saying only three or four migal magnetic field exposure which is nothing is increased statistical significant risk of childhood leukemia
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's like four four to five mil it's like four to five migal next to yeah which is kind of interesting because how many of us sleep in beds with heads with heads that are right next to an outlet and so you have a pretty big magnetic field right there yeah how and remember the threshold for childhood leukemia is only 3 to four milligals for increased statistically significant risk
there has been over you know multiple um agreed upon research population level studies showing that very weak magnetic fields increase statistically significant increased risk in childhood leukemia
So if you're sleeping in a house and your bed most of our beds are right up against the wall and I guarantee most of you guys listening to this are sleeping within a few feet of an outlet. So measure the magnetic field at that outlet because you have to know what's going on there.