The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we've talked about the fact that it's elderly who are at most risk and like we said the media has not talked about why that may be certainly we know people with comorbidities are at higher risk but do you also think that the elderly are are maybe I should just ask you why do you think the elderly are at so much risk yeah okay so no good one and there is an infirmity with age anyway in a general sense so I think in fair that's part of it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.