The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you eventually max out at about plus 2.5 or plus three because that's the amount of extra refractive power that you need in magnifiers to take the equivalent of your Infinity viewing and bring it up to 14 in to read it near basically you need a plus three and then you don't need any lens ey muscle action whatsoever so you kind of max out around 2.5S or three
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.