The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So during that process there has to be disjunct disjunction of each of the pairs of chromosomes. So there 23 pairs of chromosomes including uh X and Y the sex chromosomes. Um and during that dis disjunction phase is when we think most of the errors happen because if they don't divide evenly like 23 and 23 you're going to get an extra one or you're going to be missing one.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.