David Sinclair· PhD
That's right, included in the show notes are the scientific references that we now have in front of us that we're going to talk about so that people can do a deep dive, even deeper than what we're going to do here today.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
That's right, included in the show notes are the scientific references that we now have in front of us that we're going to talk about so that people can do a deep dive, even deeper than what we're going to do here today.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.