Andrew Huberman· PhD
So, AMH, antimmalarian hormone, the easiest way to look at it is every uh 0.1 of AMH averages to one follicle. That's an easy way to calculate it in your head.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, AMH, antimmalarian hormone, the easiest way to look at it is every uh 0.1 of AMH averages to one follicle. That's an easy way to calculate it in your head.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You mentioned earlier that with AMH, whatever units it's measured in, 0.1 of the typical units it's measured in corresponds to one egg.