The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
higher thite levels these anti-androgenic phics were Expos you know associated with less masculine male typical play in our male boys so this is thid exposure to the to the mom baby is born in the young human child four four yeah four years of age four years of age less Rough and Tumble type play that's right among the boys whose mothers were exposed to Mor phalates during a critical period of development
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we see tenant we see they are more likely if they had been exposed to these stots to want to play dress up and have tea parties more likely doesn't mean that they're all going to but that's the direction and so on so I think we have to just think about more likely not absolute yeah