The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so there was neil with the thrifty gene that is you need to be selected to get food when you can there's probably some truth to that maybe not everybody's dying of starvation but if you're not getting enough food you may not be big enough to win the battle for mates in a poliginous physical combat mating system and so that may that may select for wanting to eat more
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there was Neil with the Thrifty Gene that is you need to be selected to get food when you can there's probably some truth to that maybe not everybody who's dying of starvation but if you're not getting enough food you may not be big enough to win the battle for mates in a polygynous physical combat mating system um and so that may that may select for wanting to eat more