The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And by the way, just as a side note, this is one hypothesis about what goes on with savantism in in autism is that somebody for whatever genetic set of reasons ends up devoting a ton of real estate to let's say the Rubik's cube or the piano or memorizing visual scenes or something and then they are absolutely superhuman at it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.