The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what you attend to is being turned up in the brain and what you're not attending to is being turned down it's kind of like glass half full glass half empty and if you're paying attention to the sort of good things then those are getting kind of priority of access to your brain so you're kind of getting like oh every it's magnifying every little small positive surprise is Amplified in your brain and you get a bigger dopamine hit for that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.