Andrew Huberman· PhD
Well, you could imagine, and I think this will be beneficial for most people to focus on nasal breathing while doing any kind of focused work that doesn't require that you speak, or eat, or ingest something.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Well, you could imagine, and I think this will be beneficial for most people to focus on nasal breathing while doing any kind of focused work that doesn't require that you speak, or eat, or ingest something.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
There's a separate paper published in the journal of neuroscience that showed that indeed if subjects, human subjects, are restricted to breathing through their nose, they learn better than if they have the option of breathing through their mouth, or a combination of their nose and mouth.